---+Grammar Engineering Frequently Asked Questions ---++I have a type/lexical entry/rule which doesn't seem to be inheriting a constraint from its supertype. What might be going on? There are probably several possible causes for this, but here's one to look out for: If you have a typo in a feature name at the very highest level of the feature structure (e.g., =SYSNEM= instead of =SYNSEM= in a lexical type), the LKB will simply posit a new feature. Any constraints written below that feature will be ineffective, since nothing else in the grammar is looking for =SYSNEM=. If you're particularly unlucky, the new feature will be ordered first, and you'll see what you're expecting to see when you do [[ViewType][View > Type]]. You'd only notice that there's also a feature =SYNSEM= (inherited from a supetype, with lots of constraints associated with it) if you scroll down in the type window. ---+++Related Topics * [[ViewType][How do I see what a type looks like with all of the constraints it inherits from supertypes?]] * [[ViewEntry][How do I look at fully specified lexical entries or rules?]] * [[NewFeature][I'm trying to add a new feature, and the LKB doesn't like it. What should I do?]] -- EmilyBender - 04 Nov 2004
This topic: Main
>
WebHome
>
GrammarEngineeringFAQ
>
ConfusingTypo
Topic revision: r1 - 2004-11-04 - TWikiGuest
Copyright © 2008-2026 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki?
Send feedback